Jump to content

Photo
- - - - -

Arma 3 lighting


  • Please log in to reply
80 replies to this topic
Thread Starter
poppidypoop
poppidypoop

    Private

  • Members
  • 6 posts

#1

Posted 28 February 2012 - 01:22

From the looks of the screenshots, the lighting in Arma 3 already looks good. I really think the new Arma is going to have some good graphics, but I think they should take into account the lighting in past video games and use it as an example. For example, STALKER Call Of Pripyat was phenomenal with the lighting, and looked almost photorealistic in some parts with a few mods installed. Lighting is one of the most important parts of video game graphics.

[FOXHOUND] Azza
[FOXHOUND] Azza

    Gunnery Sergeant

  • Members
  • 544 posts

#2

Posted 28 February 2012 - 01:31

I will sleep better knowing ur thoughts on the lighting. stop spamming this forum. theres already a lighting thread.

Thread Starter
poppidypoop
poppidypoop

    Private

  • Members
  • 6 posts

#3

Posted 28 February 2012 - 01:54

There is? Sorry, I checked, but I couldn't find one. And if you don't care, this post is not for you. I thought maybe a dev would see it, I don't know if they read the posts, I'm new to the forums.

antoineflemming
antoineflemming

    Warrant Officer

  • Members
  • 2852 posts

#4

Posted 28 February 2012 - 02:02

Use the ArmA 3: Community wishes & ideas|NO DISCUSSION thread. Don't make a thread for every thing you want to say. Because, I guarantee you, this thread will be locked.

Posted Image

Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image
| Mediterranean Operations Addon | LION OF THE CASPIAN Expansion Pack |

System Specs:
Spoiler

Max Power
Max Power

    Mr. Angry Face

  • Members
  • 12828 posts

#5

Posted 28 February 2012 - 02:16

I did a quick search for threads about lighting and there are very specific threads about the number of lights, etc, and very broad topics about the ArmA 3 engine in general. I don't see anything wrong with a thread about lighting in general per se, I think that such a topic could have a little more meat to it than a suggestion to check out the Stalker series. But, once we again exhaust all conversation about deferred lighting, I'm not sure where we can go from there. I'll leave the thread open for a bit and see if anything interesting happens.

If anyone sees anything that looks like a rule violation, please just report it.

Edited by Max Power, 28 February 2012 - 03:49.

Posted Image
Posted Image
My inbox is fill and won't be emptied. If your PM is regarding requests to use my work, unfortunately I choose not to grant such permission. My work is for use with CWR2 only.

Thread Starter
poppidypoop
poppidypoop

    Private

  • Members
  • 6 posts

#6

Posted 28 February 2012 - 02:52

Thank you :). Sorry, I'm new to the forums and don't quite know the rules. But still, this thread was more about lighting in past games (primarily stalker).

PuFu
PuFu

    Poly Bully

  • Members
  • 7214 posts

#7

Posted 28 February 2012 - 07:00

Thank you :). Sorry, I'm new to the forums and don't quite know the rules.

You should, since they are shown on registration

But still, this thread was more about lighting in past games (primarily stalker).

If that is the case this thread doesn't belong in A3 subsection anyways

Posted Image


Thread Starter
poppidypoop
poppidypoop

    Private

  • Members
  • 6 posts

#8

Posted 28 February 2012 - 23:59

Sorry didn't see it.


And it does belong in the A3 section, it is about lighting in past video games setting an example for the lighting system in A3.

Flash Thunder
Flash Thunder

    Warrant Officer

  • Members
  • 2278 posts

#9

Posted 29 February 2012 - 00:59

The biggest lie in the world is

I have read and agree to the terms of usage.

Seems to be the case here.

Read the rules!
*HAF 922 Cooler Master case
*ASUS Maximus VI Gene Republic of Gamers Motherboard
*Intel Core i5 4670k Haswell @3.8ghz
*Corsair Vengeance 8GB DDR3 @1600mhz
*EVGA GTX 970 4GB VRAM
*Seagate 1TB 7200rpm HDD
*Corsair 850Watt PSU modular
*ASUS PB278Q 27' WQHD LED 2560x1440p PLS @60hz

DMarkwick
DMarkwick

    Major

  • Members
  • 7298 posts

#10

Posted 29 February 2012 - 09:17

Deferred lighting FTW.
Feel like ArmA is letting you down in some way? Watch this:
https://www.youtube....h?v=Fh3webkCo4Y

MadDogX
MadDogX

    Mindless F@nb0!

  • Moderator
  • 9050 posts

#11

Posted 29 February 2012 - 09:22

Deferred lighting FTW.

Still hoping for this, but it doesn't seem to be used in the latest screenshots that show the "new lighting". Considering the effort required to switch to deferred lighting, the chances appear to be slim.

Gigabyte Z97-HD3 Motherboard | Intel Core i5 4690k @ 4.5GHz | NVidia GTX 970
16GB G-Skill Ripjaws 2133MHz RAM | Kingston HyperX SSD | be Quiet! 750W PSU

Mandrake
Mandrake

    First Sergeant

  • Members
  • 884 posts

#12

Posted 29 February 2012 - 09:38

Rules are for children and idiots. Laws however...well that's different ;)

@OP: Welcome to the forums! Don't worry, despite first impressions it isn't usually this anally retentive around here; in fact most days you will actually find plenty of people willing to discuss game-related stuff like your post.

I completely agree that lighting is essential to the game experience - you only have to look at how much $$$ Hollywood spends on lighting movies to understand its effect on mood and immersion. One of the big 'concerns' about A3 has always been that, due to the scale of the game, the lighting engine might remain somewhat limited. Don't get me wrong; I find the HDR in Arma2 really impressive, but when the sky is clouded over and there isn't much bloom etc going on, the Armaverse can look incredibly flat and lifeless. I really hope the devs have managed to innovate in this department to make Lemnos visually stunning all day long :)
Spoiler

pvt_ryan
pvt_ryan

    Corporal

  • Members
  • 75 posts

#13

Posted 29 February 2012 - 20:34

it isn't usually this anally retentive around here

:butbut:

Posted Image


Minoza
Minoza

    Master Sergeant

  • Members
  • 798 posts

#14

Posted 29 February 2012 - 20:47

I'd be happy with any improvement when it comes to multiple dynamic light sources. I'm not sure if it's doable within new lighting system and what would be the performance cost but I can't really see the purpose of improving lighting engine if it retains the same limitations of the old lighting system...

Mandrake
Mandrake

    First Sergeant

  • Members
  • 884 posts

#15

Posted 03 March 2012 - 10:00

Musil: Honestly, though—although it might sound a little staged—the best weapon for me is new lighting model, which I like very much personally. Visually, it’s a big step up from our previous games. I hope this weapon will be great help for promoting our game.


Manna from heaven :cool:
Spoiler

metalcraze
metalcraze

    First Lieutenant

  • Members
  • 5157 posts

#16

Posted 03 March 2012 - 11:53

If you will check those recent screenshots you will notice that the lighting system has been improved.
In fact one of the screenshots shows a cloudy sky (the one with the little bird) and look how good it looks. In fact to me it looks like early Crysis videos where they still didn't go overboard with those godrays, just a pure HDR.

What I really hope for though is BIS improving shadows so they won't look blocky. GTA4 f.e. uses some kind of filter that dithers edges and gives shadows a more natural look.
ArmA2: "Doc, I'm wounded, I can barely aim and I'm bleeding badly, come on pull my body out of the harm's way and treat me before I die!"
ArmA3: "You are wounded! Click to instantly regenerate health whenever you feel like it!"

Guess two years post-release aren't enough to make ArmA3 at least half as dumbed down.

Minoza
Minoza

    Master Sergeant

  • Members
  • 798 posts

#17

Posted 03 March 2012 - 12:30

I was thinking more of limitations, not the looks. I agree, screenshots look amazing, but they only show how scene is lit by the sun or moon. What they don't show is how objects react to flashlights or car lights etc... You can't really tell from the one with car lights we have.

metalcraze
metalcraze

    First Lieutenant

  • Members
  • 5157 posts

#18

Posted 03 March 2012 - 14:39

If your question is 'will objects behind walls be lit up by car lights?' - well the answer is unfortunately yes. That's how 3D rendering works.
UNLESS that said wall together with other objects will project shadows. Then it will be realistic. But on screenshots I didn't see any shadows from car lights so...

I think it can be improved if cars won't light up objects 100 or 200m away like they do currently in OA. For some reason their light is too exaggerated.
ArmA2: "Doc, I'm wounded, I can barely aim and I'm bleeding badly, come on pull my body out of the harm's way and treat me before I die!"
ArmA3: "You are wounded! Click to instantly regenerate health whenever you feel like it!"

Guess two years post-release aren't enough to make ArmA3 at least half as dumbed down.

PuFu
PuFu

    Poly Bully

  • Members
  • 7214 posts

#19

Posted 03 March 2012 - 15:05

If your question is 'will objects behind walls be lit up by car lights?' - well the answer is unfortunately yes. That's how 3D rendering works.

Who's ass do you get this shit from? And since when are you the fucking expert regarding lighting/shading and 3d rendering?

UNLESS that said wall together with other objects will project shadows. Then it will be realistic. But on screenshots I didn't see any shadows from car lights so...

False, again. One has NOTHING to do with the other.

now really, how did that logic test of yours went? Because you seem to be coming back with the same flawed arguments and incompleted pieces of information...

Edited by PuFu, 03 March 2012 - 15:08.

Posted Image


Minoza
Minoza

    Master Sergeant

  • Members
  • 798 posts

#20

Posted 03 March 2012 - 17:38

If your question is 'will objects behind walls be lit up by car lights?' - well the answer is unfortunately yes. That's how 3D rendering works.
UNLESS that said wall together with other objects will project shadows. Then it will be realistic. But on screenshots I didn't see any shadows from car lights so...

I think it can be improved if cars won't light up objects 100 or 200m away like they do currently in OA. For some reason their light is too exaggerated.


Even in the case of real-time 3D rendering that's not true, maybe if we were in 2004...