TSAndrey

I had that oilrig, until a worker screwed up and caused an explosion. Oil prices have seriously increased since then...

At one point, promises and words become meaningless and there need to be actual improvements to performance

Ok? OK?!?! That PC is amazing and the single fact that your FPS drops to 25 proves that the game is broken!

What's the point of Multiplayer if we're FPS-restricted to small scale coop missions then? You can't blame the mission makers for BI's broken game! Even in BI's official mission End Game the FPS is still horrible.

Well, End Game is a good gamemode but the FPS is horrible. Can people now please stop saying it's the mission makers fault for low FPS?

FFV? Bipods? 3D Editor?

Normal performance

It's not "sometimes", it's always like that. If the server is slow or the mission is "unoptimized", clients will CPU bottleneck and you will get 15-20FPS no matter what.

Doubt it. Arma 3 has very big netcode/engine issues. DX12 could maybe help a bit if it increases CPU performance, but it won't solve Arma 3's performance issues.

If you find a way to make it work, please release it!

LOL People need to stop making posts like this (no offense). If he gets low FPS like that in SP, then yes it could be a problem, but MP FPS is unfixable.

System requirements have basically no meaning. Only CPU is important and even that will only get you a couple more FPS.

OP is right though, Arma 3 is borderline unplayable. Fanboys can lie to themselves, make up reasons and defend the game all they want, but it won't change anything. ---------- Post added at 18:18 ---------- Previous post was at 18:16 ---------- It never got fixed in A2. I have the same horrible FPS in A2 like I do in A3, which is silly considering the graphic difference.

Haha, no it's not.

A new GPU won't help you at all. You'll still bottleneck like everyone and get low FPS. A new GPU will only allow you to play at higher graphic settings while playing at low FPS. A new CPU might help a bit, but the FPS will always be low.