clawhammer

Member
  • Content count

    979
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

Community Reputation

10 Good

7 Followers

About clawhammer

  • Rank
    First Sergeant

core_pfieldgroups_3

  • Interests
    Friends, PC, Photography, Reading, Writing, Cooking and Sport
  1. Iam thinking of giving this game a try. Can i play this game with my friends? Does it have some kind of group function so that i can easly enter a server with my friends in one team? Thanks for the help!
  2. For me the immersion breaks if i start to walk in vr while in real life i sit in my chair. Maybe this star trek game would be ok (If you sit all the time at your station, i haddnt the oppertunity to test this game) or games where you are in a cockpit like elite, dcs or racinggames (as long as their are not to fast or hectic). Thats why i said 'putting screens on your eyes'! because the truth is, only the eyes get pleased by this "VR". And if you ask me, the eyes are the totaly wrong interface for VR in my opinion. Compare this VR tech with VR tech from fictional movies like matrix or sword art online. They all directly inject the vr into our brains, so we have our full body and can feel the enviroment. We are so far away from that If we finally someday get this kind of technolgy i would say we have a real vr tech. I want to see that. Glasses that only joy the eyes are allready a dead technology, we only use it because we have nothing better. And lets not forget the resolution issue, motion sickness, eye focus problems etc etc Sry that iam "personally" not that immersed with this tech so far.
  3. Currently vr glasses have too much childhood diseases. I have no problem if bi waits until theses glasses are finally really usable. But iam skeptical. Simply putting screens on your eyes and ignoring that the rest of your buddy is not part of the vr will never be a immersive solotuion.
  4. Steam says that i only can purchase this dlc as gift, since it is already locked into my account. I have this supporter edition too. Looks like there is something wrong with ur steam account. Contact the support.
  5. I must say that iam really a fan of this cheap cpu. If you are on a budget it is made for you. Just 50 bucks and you can play all actual titels with it. And since it is the newest socket, you can upgrade to an i7 7700k at any time (Maybe Cofee Lake too soon) and it can run with DDR4 RAM. The Pentium G4650 is very close to the i3 6100 (Even with 2 Cores + 2 HT Threads instead of 4 Cores like the i3 has) which cost 50 bucks more. So dont buy the i3, go for the Pentium!
  6. There is already such an thread, and the 10k got already beaten (by me too):
  7. It seems like ur schedule works a tiny bit faster :D
  8. Here is a german test about the scheduling, smt, windows 7 vs windows 10, HPET and core parking. https://www.computerbase.de/2017-03/ryzen-windows-7-benchmark-core-parking/ It seems there is no windows 10 schedule bug (which has been also denied by an amd blog post) but there are other issues. EDIT: Oh ok nedflanders was faster :D
  9. Around 11:30 is an ArmA 3 Benchmark
  10. It would be intresting to disable the power saving features in the bios too (Is AMD still using cool and quiet?). So that all cores run with 100% clock speed all the time. Not good for general use, but it would be intresting what happens if the cpu dont get clocked down by the system.
  11. http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Ryzen-7-1800X-CPU-265804/Tests/Test-Review-1222033/ Here in crysis 3 the 1800X beat all the 4 core i5/i7 CPUs That gives me some hopes for Star Citizen at least, which is based on the cryengine.
  12. Just in applications that only use not more then 4 cores. I see it more as a software problem. If all games would use 8 cores we would have a different result. Look at the crysis 3 benchmarks, here is the ryzen performance very good because the engine is well written for multicore cpu's
  13. I get with these settings in the first benchmark above 33.9 fps with my i7 4790k + GTX 980ti Thanks for the benchmarks! The i7 4790k kills the ryzen :-(
  14. That would be awesome! I searched for some ArmA 3 benchmark missions: https://forums.bistudio.com/topic/142875-arma3mark-benchmark-your-arma-3/ http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=375092418 Both are old, but should still work. If we match our graphic settings i could throw my benchmarks result into this too. So we have more data :-) I would suggest a 720p run too with low graphic settings to make sure our gpu's dont interfere much.
  15. So the new ryzen cpus are out, and i think a lot of us want to know how these bad boys perform on arma 3 right? So please, if you can find any benchmarks, post them here. If you made a benchmark by urself, please show it to us! :-) My personal feeling about these cpus is, we will get the same problems with these cpu we got with the old amd fx cpus. Lots of multicore performance which gets totally ignored by arma and low fps because of bad single core performance. I really want to upgrade, but i really fear that my old i7 4790k will outperform the ryzen cpu. I hope iam wrong. So please, if you guys find anything please post it here, iam reall intrested into this. And of course, what do you guys think? Share your toughts Thanks!