Jump to content

dagosyno

Member
  • Content Count

    1
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

Community Reputation

10 Good

About dagosyno

  • Rank
    Newbie

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. So... You know how there was ArmA 3, which was pretty expensive. Yeah. It had some content, but not really alot of it. There was a dlc bundle, that added a fair amount of stuff to the game in total. Not anything huge, but decent. Then there came Apex, which for an Expansion added about nothing, besides FEW guns, vehicles and clothings, and a map, that looks good, i heard from my friend that performance... well it could be better. There is also dlc bundle 2 coming up, with 4 dlcs. But looking at A2 wih A2:OA THATS SO LOW. When ArmA 2 standalone had a small loan of hundreds guns, GOOD amount of vehicles, OA added many new land vehicles, annother GOOD amount of weapons, that were quite unique in some cases, like lee enfield or so, and also a brand new feature to arma 2: Backpacks. A3 and its dlc's/expansion dont really add much. And for what price. OA didnt even use to cost all that much back in time. My question is: Why. Why it changed so much since then. Why the content, which should be in the game, is released few years after, in such small steps.
×