Hi all
That was the easiest forum poll to answer yes to ever.
As to the ArmA VON its best part is the Direct Speak, keep that bit.
Kind regards walker
Hi all
That was the easiest forum poll to answer yes to ever.
As to the ArmA VON its best part is the Direct Speak, keep that bit.
Kind regards walker
You are only a bullet away from being stupid.
-Travis Haley - Magpul Dynamics - Art of the Dynamic ShotgunI don't use a pump to scare somebody. I use a pump to shoot somebody.
-Christ Costa - Art of the Art of the Tactical Carbine 11911 mag, twinkie, twinkie, cupcake, primary weapon magazine... OH! There it is!
We tried to use VON in-game. Failed miserably (dropped packets made all speech unintelligble). We now use Ventrilo.
Would love to have something that actually works in game. I voted yes.
Automatic mumble grouping based from arma groups would be excellent twist.
Voted YES. Voice in this game is one of the most important things, and why not fix it with something that actually works, Mumble?
I think some of you got this wrong. Read the first post again, this doesn't mean they'd completely integrate Mumble into ArmA2, only that they'd send the ingame position to Mumble so directional sound would work. Mumble would stay a 3rd party app, same as it is now.
Hi all
I believe we are talking about a socket for Mumble to get game state information such as auto group channel creation and Deadforchannel shifting.
Kind Regards walker
I too understood this poll is only about the positional audio.
The first post says:
Not to say that a full support wouldn't be nice, but I find it hard to believe it ever happens.What exactly would this mean is not implementing whole Mumble but only linking to Mumble via Link plugin : http://mumble.sourceforge.net/Link
* this will allow positional placement of voice according to ingame world coordinates etc.
Last edited by Fincuan; Sep 18 2009 at 19:53.
I would rather see VON upgraded with "newer technology and codec" so it can compete with mumble.