View Poll Results: Would you have a new vegetation detail in arma2 ?

Voters
95. This poll is closed
  • no , it run well

    31 32.63%
  • yes, i want because actual one sucks (perfs wise)

    38 40.00%
  • i don't care

    8 8.42%
  • who are you ?

    18 18.95%
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 48

Thread: Request: Alternative vegetation detail

  1. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Deadfast View Post
    There is nothing wrong with the vegetation, I have the same card with 512 video memory less. It works just fine at 1680x1050, medium terrain detail, high texture detail, 2x AA and the rest on very high.
    Yes there is, Ais can see you trough the clutter (an old discussed subject which still need solution)

    I'm not quite sure if i understand the question in this poll..

    If i would like to have a new vegetation?

    If the mentioned problem not solved, yes please i want a new vegetation, if BIS can be completely fix the issue with it, no i don't want another vegetation.

    Until i clear this doubt i won't vote.

  2. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by GLeek View Post
    it does. look at my 2 screenshots. things are crystal clear
    It is far from crystal clear. Your GPU is perfectly suitable to this game, which should run ok with it, with a good level of details.. But of course if you get rid of vegetation and terrain details it'll go faster...

    WW1 ArmA:CWA Mod || Romans and Barbarians ArmA:CWA Mod
    Goodbye W0lle, we'll miss you

  3. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by ProfTournesol View Post
    It is far from crystal clear. Your GPU is perfectly suitable to this game, which should run ok with it, with a good level of details.. But of course if you get rid of vegetation and terrain details it'll go faster...
    In his case it should run faster though, but since alot of others (inluding myself) have better performance with the 4870 i guess its something on his end.

  4. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by ProfTournesol View Post
    It is far from crystal clear. Your GPU is perfectly suitable to this game, which should run ok with it, with a good level of details.. But of course if you get rid of vegetation and terrain details it'll go faster...
    2 shot at same point . same heading , same settings all indentical , BUT RESOLUTION . i underlined the GPU bottleneck here .

    ---------- Post added at 03:38 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:36 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by bravo 6 View Post
    Yes there is, Ais can see you trough the clutter (an old discussed subject which still need solution)

    I'm not quite sure if i understand the question in this poll..

    If i would like to have a new vegetation?

    If the mentioned problem not solved, yes please i want a new vegetation, if BIS can be completely fix the issue with it, no i don't want another vegetation.

    Until i clear this doubt i won't vote.
    problem is not solved, because i don't want to unpbo and unbinarized all arma2 island project each time they are released.
    with standard grass clutter, it still runs at 20fps , wich is unplayable. i can't play with these orange tree.
    i would like an alternative vegetation detail slider not linked with soldier , vehicle , and building 3d detail. come on ! object on normal give you 1998 era graphics in your acog !




    ---------- Post added at 03:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:38 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by NeMeSiS View Post
    In his case it should run faster though, but since alot of others (inluding myself) have better performance with the 4870 i guess its something on his end.
    you should try LDDK island . and see by yourself .
    Last edited by GLeek; Aug 25 2009 at 15:42.
    The Ultrazone

  5. #15
    And you still haven't given us your CPU/RAM/OS. It's not a given that your GPU is the bottleneck just because you cranked up the resolution. CPU plays a part in that as well.

  6. #16
    Also turnng off AA will help if you are looking for more performance at higher resolutions.
    "It takes a big man to admit when he is wrong...I'm not a big man." Chevy Chase, Fletch Lives

  7. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by GLeek View Post
    object on normal give you 1998 era graphics in your acog !
    I know exactly what you mean. I can only play a decently fluid game with 800x600 resolution and while playing with it reminds me my old games

    Though i like the gameplay in MP server, thats why i keep this resolution with my crappy system.

    If new vegetation appears to improve FPS, i might use it.

  8. #18
    AA and 3D Resolution for my rig kills my frame rate.

    AA by a solid 20FPS

    and 3D Res at 200% any Res by 15 or 20FPS.

    I got an ATI 3650 512MB and I can hardly achieve 30FPS on Medium settings, with No AA.


    BIS really needs to work on the Engine because I can Play Crysis on High at 30FPS.

    Is there a Shader Option besides the fillrate in the final game?
    Arma 3 Alpha is amazingly stable for me lots of good fixes BIS! Highly looking forward to beta and full release!
    Spoiler:

  9. #19
    i have a q6600 @ 3.2Ghz, 4gb ram and a 8800GTS 512mb and i get way better fps than you do. Must be something else. I dont think its your gpu since its way stronger than mine.

  10. #20
    The poll doesn't really suit to the problem. You want an additional option to set the vegetation detail, but it's the engine that is not optimized. It makes no sense to me, so I didn't vote so far.

    Anyway, I'm experiencing the same bad performance running a e8400, 4gb ddr2, 8800gt 512mb.

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •