Page 2 of 15 FirstFirst 12345612 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 142

  Click here to go to the first Developer post in this thread.  

Thread: Is BIS looking after the "receiving..." issue?

  1. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by S!fkaIaC View Post
    WRONG! EAAAAAAAAAAAASY!!! I invite both BIS and NVIDIA into my home, I will provide housing, barbecue, beverage and a fucked up system and/or ArmA2, they can provide their competence. It takes me 10 minutes playing and I reproduce the bug for sure and they can start slapping the arguments around their heads about who might be guilty.
    its not only NVIDIA i have ati HD3870x2 and this same prob

  2. #12
    Ye, it ain't just a Nvidia problem. I have an ATi card and getting this bug since ArmA2 is out. Even some of my friends have this bug and they have diffrent graphic cards, cpu's, ram and so on.

    I would be very happy to hear a little sentence like: "We're on it."
    It's not fair to leave us in the darkness and let us reinstall the game, os, drivers etc. w/o any diffrence.

    THIS CAN'T BE!

  3. #13
    I thing i solve this bug i just put my video memory to normal work for me just tested 2h on longesday servers but work
    my rig
    cpu: e6850@3,6ghz
    mem : 4g OCZ raper
    gpu : hd3870x2
    mobo : asus p5q deluxe
    os : WinXp pro sp3

    what its strange whit high video memory i dont lose any fps so i wanna play on hi settings hope future patche will fix this

  4. #14
    I have 5 friends in a clan. One guy has two new machines (he built for his kids) and both have ATI 4870 1GB in them. Both get the receiving error time and again.

    I myself have had this issue in single and multiplayer but almost always in multiplayer.

    I have almost decided to forget about ARMA2 it is that frustrating. My friend was going to buy it but after seeing what happens on his rigs he said no way, waste of money.

    I really want to love ARMA2 but in its current form for me and many others and no word on any fix for this I may just be left with writing it off.
    Last edited by Dogtags; Jul 6 2009 at 23:57.
    [SIZE="1"]OS: Windows 7 RC (Runs ARMA2 better than XP)
    Graphic Card: GTX460 (Gigabyte)
    Memory: 16GB
    Processor: Intel 3770K 3.5-3.9Ghz
    Graphic Card Memory: 1GB
    Monitor: Dell 23" 1920 x 1080
    Hard drive: 1x 1TB + 128GB Samsung 830 SSD
    Motherboard: Gigabyte

  5. #15
    I am beginning to wonder if you started this thread to Troll it...

    It absolutely CAN Take a long time to find a memory leak depending on what you're working with.
    Have you personally ever debuged a program much less a Graphics Engine?

  6. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by No1sadvocate=US= View Post
    I am beginning to wonder if you started this thread to Troll it...

    It absolutely CAN Take a long time to find a memory leak depending on what you're working with.
    Have you personally ever debuged a program much less a Graphics Engine?

    Sure. It CAN. But it WILL take forever if you never start.
    I could also skip pulling down pants before toilet because it CAN be to late.
    But if I give up before, I will always shizz into my pants

    What I am missing here (or it is unknown due to the poor PR-work) is statistical analysis e.g. commons and differences between the rigs of all reporting this issue, starting to exclude causes e.t.c. I have not seen any REAL SYSTEMATIC way collecting data. The laughable polls in the forums regarding happiness do not say anything.

    And until know, I do not know EXACTLY in which cases the ArmA2 application is rising the "Receiving" screen. It is for sure not meant to show an error, rather a placeholder whenever visual data are delayed.
    But giving us more insight here could help us by helping then to help us what did I wanted to say
    Last edited by S!fkaIaC; Jul 7 2009 at 06:05.

  7. #17
    No offense dude, but do you have any competence in programming software?
    He`s not saying it`s hard to REPRODUCE that bug (what you meant) but it`s hard to find the piece of code or state of the whole program that`s causing it.
    Anyway, BI`s information strategy could be better.

  8. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by da_smirk View Post
    No offense dude, but do you have any competence in programming software?
    He`s not saying it`s hard to REPRODUCE that bug (what you meant) but it`s hard to find the piece of code or state of the whole program that`s causing it.
    Anyway, BI`s information strategy could be better.

    I hear you. And I meant indeed REPRODUCING, because that is usually the half way of fixing it.

    But I refuse to accept that SW devs claiming they do anything special. If you know your business, you can perform as in any other area.

    And we paid BIS the money trusting they KNOW what they are doing.

  9.   Click here to go to the next Developer post in this thread.   #19
    it's being worked on ....
    oh btw there is systematic data collecting as we are receiving reports via MS WER (Windows Error Reporting) for years ...

    it was mentioned more than just multiple times since 2001

  10. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by Dwarden View Post
    it's being worked on ....
    oh btw there is systematic data collecting as we are receiving reports via MS WER (Windows Error Reporting) for years ...

    it was mentioned more than just multiple times since 2001

    Oh-ohhhhhhh Big B is watching me. all my smurf and porn downloads are reported too

    Wai..Wait a minute, I turned off WER and uploaded .rpt and dot-whatever as been told, not used?


    Btw, I use since yesterday 186.24 and I got 5h WITHOUT Rec-Bug, but I had this also with 190.?? and next day it returned, I hesitate to shout "hurray" now. I will try to get into a crCTI until weekend and report if it solves (for me) this issue.


    BUT STILL: why can't BIS more open in telling what exactly triggers that sceen? Current info-level is still: "something went seriously wrong....."

    Wow - we all thought this is normal.

Page 2 of 15 FirstFirst 12345612 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •