Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 59

Thread: Why a harrier?

  1. #11
    well, the harrier is a good ground support aircraft, and doesn't need mutch more place than the cobras to work out of.... i guess thats why they chose the harrier.

    and anotherthing you can try, land the harrier on the roof downtown paradisio?

    or start? do that with the f-18

    Quote Originally Posted by MadDogX View Post
    Dude, this is an internet forum. You can't expect people to read stuff. Jeez.

  2. #12
    If you ask me it's not the harrier but the su34 that is out of place. This game doesn't lend itself very well to fast jets with the poor view distance and exaggerated terrain, easy radar and so on.
    I would've prefered they had stuck with the su-25 so that the harrier and su34 would've been optional.
    I won't not promise to avoid refraining from harming you.

  3. #13
    yeah, instead of the su-34, they could have used either the Yak 41m or Yak-38

  4. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by (BraTTy @ July 19 2007,12:28)
    And haven't you seen Die Hard 4 ?
    The Harrier !
    Maybe he was thinking of "True Lies" with arrrrnold.
    Alienware
    Intel P4 3.67Ghz - Abit AA8XE - Nvidia 7950GT 512Mb - 2GB Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 533MHz - SoundBlaster Audigy 2 ZS

  5. #15
    Chief Warrant Officer Beagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 30 2001
    Location
    Holy Roman Empire
    Posts
    3,407
    The only bad decission with the Harrier was it's Wapons Loadout.

    2xSidewinders plus centerline Gunpods and 2x Mavericks and 2X FFAR Pods would have been better as a FAC, and 12X Mk82 or Mk20 cluster bombs on TERs in strike and CAS config.




  6. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by (Beagle @ July 19 2007,14:40)
    The only bad decission with the Harrier was it's Wapons Loadout.

    2xSidewinders plus centerline Gunpods and 2x Mavericks and 2X FFAR Pods would have been better as a FAC, and 12X Mk82 or Mk20 cluster bombs on TERs in strike and CAS config.
    Agree x 100. The Harrier and A-10 are perfect CAS aircraft for Sahrani due to their slow speed maneuverability (A-10) and ability to operate out of marginal airfields (both).

    The real shame is the load outs. 6x GBU-12s? That's a very expensive load for such a tiny island. Every BLUFOR airplane as well as many of the helicopters should always always always have A2A armament on them. AH-1Z, AV-8B, A-10 all should have sidewinders.

  7. #17
    oh yeah, I vouch for outfitting mk20's on various planes. would make for some killer special fx

  8. #18
    Gunnery Sergeant USMC NEEDER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 31 2007
    Location
    Fort Lauderdale, Florida
    Posts
    460
    Author of the Thread
    I Agree

  9. #19
    I think the bluefor aircraft in arma are good choices. I think that the armaments were designed for gameplay purposes.


    Please use the CWR2 CBT to help us provide a better experience.

  10. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by (Noraf @ July 19 2007,18:56)
    yeah, instead of the su-34, they could have used either the Yak 41m or Yak-38
    The Yak38....werent those things removed from the Russian Navy because they kept falling out of the Sky? I think I'd prefer Su-25 or older ground support jets like Su-22 or MiG-27

    @Frederf: I think its pretty rare if not unheard of for Apaches and Cobras to carry A2A missiles. What we need is Franze/Nod's AH-64 with its customizable loadouts



    MY AWESOME PC: Intel 8088 @ 4.77MHz | 128KB DRAM | MC6845 4KB Monochrome Graphics card | 10MB Seagate ST-412 Hard Drive | 83-key Model F keyboard | 14" IBM 5151 green-phosphor Monitor | PC-DOS 2.0

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •