a good oneOriginally Posted by (TheRocket @ April 15 2007,23:42)
![]()
well ...
but by that logic You can say "community would program whole new engine"
in OSS style and don't bother with ArmA at all right?
i know bit overstated irony
yet most of wishlist ideas are in hope it will be "default" part of game w/o need dl xyz ...
RealTimeChat ~ARMA2 in Your browser (w/o Java), RealTimeChat ~ARMA3 in Your browser (w/o Java),
irc.GameSurge.net/ARMA2 (external IRC clients) irc.GameSurge.net/ARMA3 (external IRC clients)
ARMA 3 Feedback Tracker: http://feedback.arma3.com/my_view_page.php
~100k fans @STEAMARMA 2 + ARMA 2: OA + ARMA 3: + ~2k @XFIRE A2:OA
Follow my Twitter: http://twitter.com/FoltynD or my Facebook http://facebook.com/FoltynD
Aim is basically to avoid 1000 times expressing the same wishes, rather adding/commenting issues/wishes/feature requests at a specific place in a controlled way. For some features I would even like to trigger the creation of real design documents with focus on player needs so that development of BI can use this as an input for functionality evaluation and UI design.
I read in 100 places almost identical suggestion, mainly high level and always addressing just small chunks of a very complex issue.
Like with the inventory management I want to generate with the help of the community a design paper which should be agreed when it reached a certain quality.
If it is then used by BI to make paper birds is a risk we have to take, but this paper is then ready to use for ANY company since the demands do not change dramatically.