Page 13 of 71 FirstFirst ... 3910111213141516172363 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 130 of 702

  Click here to go to the first Developer post in this thread.  

Thread: Hardware and settings for ArmA

  1. #121
    dunno if it has been asked before, but how does a 8800 gts 320 mb perform compared to a 640 mb version?

  2. #122
    Quote Originally Posted by (smellyjelly @ April 15 2007,19:13)
    Also, I have issues where, somewhat rarely, my game will freeze for a minute to five minutes, and then suddenly resume like normal. It's unfortunate, but not too big of a deal, (until it happens again, then I'm angry *** ).
    I have experienced something like this with a game called Oblivion which btw I can run with fairly high settings without a problem except with multiple enemies.

  3. #123
    Can someone please recommend some settings for me? I've messed around with the card and in game settings and can't seem to find a sweet spot. I can get around 20-30fps reasonably steady at 1280x1024 with 1200m view distance but the texture load times are long and inconsistent.

    My rig:

    P4 3.2GHz oc'd to 3.8GHz
    2GB DDR RAM
    ATi X800XL 256 MB AGP vid card with ATi Tray Tools, running about 5% o'c with cat 6.7 drivers only.
    WinXP SP2 DX9c

    TYIA

  4. #124
    Turn off Anti-Aliasing, it's the best thing you can do. Use coolbits to disable "render frames ahead." Also make sure your aspect ratio is set to normal, not widescreen or anything else.

    The vegetation and shadows eat up performance with AA turned on. It doesn't look as great, but hell, it's worth the 20+ FPS boost that you get.

    That's the best thing I can recommend. I struggled with 15-20 FPS performance on a brand new Alienware laptop. Turned off AA and now my FPS is through the roof.
    \"When your men get home and face an anti-war protester, tell them to look him in the eyes and shake his hand. Then, wink at his girlfriend, because she knows she's dating a pussy.\"
    - General Tommy Franks

    United States Army Infantry

  5. #125
    Tried with and without AA and I get virtually no difference in performance with either setting. AA on high, fps max 50, min 30. AA off, fps max 50, min 30.

    Seems that the anisotropic filtering and object detail make the biggest hits to the frames...

  6. #126
    well my system is now as follows..

    Cpu = Athlon 4200 64x2
    GFX = Inno3d 8800GTS 320 mb
    Memory = 2.5gig Kingston PC3200
    Sound = Audigy 2 ZS
    Monitor = Fujitsu/seimens 22" widescreen

    Visibility 3500
    Reso 1024x768
    Terrain detail = High
    Objects Detail = High
    Shading = Normal
    Postprocess = Low
    Antistropic Filtering = Normal
    Shadow Detail = Normal
    Antialiasing = Low
    Blood = High

    that gets me a steady 35-45 FPS in all areas

    Pretty disappointed at the reso I need to choice, to have the game run decently & look good visually - maybe I have something wrong with my system that I need to play this way, but games like GRAW2 (which I beta test) I can crank everything to max & it plays & looks beautiful...

  7. #127
    this is mine

    Cpu = Intel p4 3.0ghz
    GFX = Saphire ati X1600 256mb AGP
    Memory = 1gig Kingston PC3200
    Sound = SB XFI xtreme music

    VD 1200m
    Reso 1024x768
    Terrain detail = very low (cant have grass, or i'll lag when view scope, prone)
    Objects Detail = v High
    Shading = v High
    Postprocess = v High
    Antistropic Filtering = v High
    Shadow Detail = v High
    Antialiasing = disabled (also FPS killer)
    Blood = High
    Texture Detail = Normal, Low when entering cities, because i will have texture artifacts (smashed gfx)

    i love the grass, but i find a compromise to disable it and still play with pretty gfx. AA seems does nothing for me, except in forest, i will lag so much even i set AA to low. so i just disable it. still wondering why i cant set texture detail higher than normal. maybe because of my RAM or Gfx memory

  8. #128
    i have:
    AMD athlon 2500 barton (overlock)
    1 giga rama
    N7600GS


    Resolution:1152x864x32
    Visibility:1010
    Terrain detail:Normal
    Objects detail:Normal
    Texture detail:Low
    Shaiding detail:Normal
    Postprocess effects:Low
    Anisotropic filteringisabled
    Shadow detail:Normal
    Antialiasingisabled
    blood:High

    In huge towns i have 15 fps boot in open place to 25 fps"if i have
    luck"




  9. #129
    1920x1200 16:10

    All performance settings maxed except AA which is on normal.

    Armamark score = 1330.53
    Game = always playable - i guess over 20 FPS average.

    System -
    C2D 6600
    2x 1GB PC6400
    XFX 7950GT
    Gigabyte 965P DS4 motherboard
    http://rusi.org/downloads/assets/FDR2.pdf - RUSI - A Force For Honour
    http://www.uknda.org/my_documents/my...essity_scr.pdf - UKNDA: A Compelling Necessity
    http://www.uknda.org/my_documents/my...ISIS_Sep08.pdf - UKNDA: Overcoming The Defence Crisis
    http://www.uknda.org/my_documents/my...y_Doc_24pp.pdf - UKNDA: A decision the next Prime Minister must make

  10. #130
    Hi all, Im thinking of getting this game but I want to know If itll be worth it with the rig I have at the moment.
    Specs:
    Intel Core Duo E6400, full 64Bit support Dual Core. (2 x 2.13Ghz)
    Graphics Card ***Nvidia Geforce 256Mb 7600GT
    Memory ***2 GB Corsair DDR2 RAM
    Motherboard ***ASUS P5VD2-MX ***
    Hard Drive(s) ***1 X Western Digital 320 GB SATA II ***
    DVDRW ***1 X LG 16XDVDRW dual layer
    PSU ***550 Watt Switching PSU
    Sound Card ***Onboard 6 Channel Surround Sound
    Windows XP

    Anyone in the know let me know asap please, will I be able to run the game with the graphics looking pretty good, Dont want to bother if they are going to look poor
    Thanks!
    Dan





Page 13 of 71 FirstFirst ... 3910111213141516172363 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •