Cold War Rearmed Discussion

[Rhodite]

GranQ - not very constructive.. another post like that will result in +1 WL

[Terox]

i thought he had come up with a new bis forum moderator motto

its kinda catchy dont ya think :-)

[Sanctuary]

GranQ - not very constructive.. another post like that will result in +1 WL

I fail to see how hidding information and knowledge in a hidden board, as it was already expressed in the "talk page" of the CWR wiki, is more constructive than GranQ, right on spot, screenshot.

[Turkmenbashi]

Are YOU happy, Terox?

edit: What Sanc said.

[deanosbeano]

so are we saying ,the cwr team are privvy to info about models and script conversion ,that the community in general are not ?
or is it simply ,"if you discover how to do something dont tell anybody " ?
i guess either way it would be a sad fact that a BIki created for the sharing of information was actualy being used as a medium to withold information, unless the content which is beng witheld, is new maps ,surprises etc.now thats a different matter.

[MAA3057]

It's for sure now: We definitely won't convert he Red Hammer campaign.

It would have felt more complete to include it; having a campaign to play as the Soviets and not just the Americans and Resistance. Total transition of the GOTY edition. I understand why it couldn't go through though.

[metalchris]

Well , with CWR , you will get all the addons that are needed to make such a campaign ,or even convert retalliation f.e.

[Jack-UK]

Red hammer wasn't that good... It was pretty cool to play the enemy but it definately wasnt the better of the three...

CWC was a great campaign

Resistance also had a good storyline, though i personally prefer playing as a structured military more than a group of guerillas who seemed to take on a batallion of Russians

I'd love to see both campaigns in arma tho...

Resistance expected to be in?

[Jackal326]

As far as I know (from what I've read on the Biki), Resistance is another project, which is going to be undertaken after CWR has been completed (and the required addons are available for use).

[granQ]

GranQ - not very constructive.. another post like that will result in +1 WL

I know this might be to push it, but i think it is constructive, maybe it was overreacting, I even asked some friends to see if it would be within reason (they said no so i presumed it was close enough).

Anyway, I think it was constructive since it did point on the issue, also showed i done some creative for the CWR goal.. (to import OFP stuff to ArmA).

I would say it was a post that had some humour, was creative and constructive, helped people with a vision on how the final result can be and inspired a discussion about the CWR information sharing policy.

Now, I might be wrong here, but I dont see so much other posts that are so constructive but more a team with "we might do this, or that.. just be sure this will be cool we let you know when its done". It just remind me of a number of projects that all failed. OWN (the swedish mod), "Unsung" and before that the vietnam mod from seventh.

Normaly there is a saying that the most dangerous a leader can surround himself with is people that only says yes. Think about that next time someone criticize.

And I would totaly understand if you warned me that the language was bad, but don't say its not constructive, it is.