Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: This cant be right...

  1. #1

    Wink

    There has been a lot of talk here about the armor of the different vehicles…someone said you could take out a M1A1 with 3 LAWs so ***I wanted to check it out for my self.
    I just opened the mission editor and added an empty M1A1 and some ammo started to shoot at the tank.

    What I came up with was this:
    Front: 6 LAW *** ***Back: 7 LAW

    Hmm what’s up with that…not very realistic!!
    The front SHOULD be more protected than the back of a tank!!
    I tried some different tanks and got the same result…the back is more protected than the front

    This cant be right! Is it just my version of OFP or what?
    BTW the extended armor option is off.

  2. #2
    Maybe you didn't hit it properly? What did you aim for? Turret? Main body? Tracks?

    And how far away were you, maybe some of the missiles missed it?

  3. #3
    Staff Sergeant
    Join Date
    Jan 5 2002
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    349
    Author of the Thread
    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Maybe you didn&#39;t hit it properly? What did you aim for? Turret? Main body? Tracks?

    And how far away were you, maybe some of the missiles missed it?[/QUOTE]<span id='postcolor'>
    I tried it several times.. always with the same result(6 to the front and 7 to the back of the tank) and I was not that far away so im sure that I hit it(aiming for the main body)

    Could anyone else please try this and tell me the result...
    Sounds like there is something wrong with my OFP...

  4. #4
    No nearly everybody i talk to says thats how many it takes, when i do it it does the same. anyway&#33; it deserves that kind of armour&#33;
    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I&#39;m not sure about the former.
    -- Albert Einstein

  5. #5
    I can&#39;t destroy it with 3 LAWs, but I can&#39;t destroy a T80 with 3 LAWs either.

  6. #6
    Staff Sergeant
    Join Date
    Jan 5 2002
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    349
    Author of the Thread
    But the thing is that the front is weaker than the back of the tank...that cant be right, it should be the other way around

  7. #7
    hmmmm ?
    >>>>>>>

    Quanta pugna est doctissimorum hominum.
    Diuturnitate pugnae defessi proelio excedebant.

  8. #8
    Hmm, i can kill the m1a1 with 6 laws from the back....also with the front. It takes 4 hit on the turret to disable it.
    http://www.footballpredictor.eu - sports betting made easy!
    \"A man without religion, is like a fish without a bicycle\"

  9. #9
    whats the best place to attack on a tank?

    i always go for its barrel so it wont be able to aim properly
    I&#39;ve slept with the girl outa hanson >

  10. #10
    Chief Warrant Officer Antichrist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 23 2001
    Location
    Aotearoa
    Posts
    3,146
    Damn that is strange in version 1.00 and demo
    3 LAWs was enough to kill Abrams
    but now it is obviously not enough

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •