Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 37

  Click here to go to the first Developer post in this thread.  

Thread: Did nasa accidentally “nuke” jupiter?

  1. #1
    Second Lieutenant VXR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 26 2002
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    4,166

    Lightbulb

    This link is what i found on a news site

    check it out

    http://www.enterprisemission.com/NukingJupiter.html

    a new sun maybe?

  2.   Click here to go to the next Developer post in this thread.   #2
    Did you want to summarize that? There is no way that the spacecraft caused a Nuclear reaction... if that's what these ppl are getting at.

    EDIT: The scale of the phenomenon is so far out of proportion to anything a space probe could trigger...



    "Peace can not be kept by force. It can only be achieved by understanding." Albert Einstein

    Please report Arma 3 bugs in the Bug Tracker

  3.   Click here to go to the next Developer post in this thread.   #3
    Über Verwalter Placebo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 23 2001
    Location
    Visby, Gotland, Sweden
    Posts
    20,999
    Please make a proper post out of this, not simply posting a link, if not the thread will be closed.
    If someone reports an issue/complains about the Alpha etc, replying in the thread "dude it's an alpha" doesn't really help anyone! Point them to the Arma3 Alpha feedback tracker instead please!

    Please do not PM or Email me directly about your CD Key issues, follow the guidance in this thread instead.

  4. #4
    Interesting theory, I saw those pics of the jupiter spots some time ago.

    The Galileo did carry _alot_ of plutonium if I remember correctly, but I dont still think it could have caused anything that big...

  5.   Click here to go to the next Developer post in this thread.   #5
    Not only is the scale of such a blast out of proportion ot this spot, but also that material is not going to just all of a sudden decide to have a nuclear reaction because it enters jupiter.

    If they did anything silly then they would have to try hard to pull it off.

  6. #6
    Hi all

    The argument in the site is well written.

    I think the continuous implosive ability of an atmosphere is better than the milisecond squeeze of a normal explosive nuclear trigger. Making even a crude device more explosive than a normall high grade nuclear bomb.

    You might even get a reactor type event where you got a slow cooking of the plutonium at a sub explosive level possibly for days. Such a point heat source might cause convection of lower level gases up to the suface. I think it would be worth doing the math on the potential energy yeild of such a sub explosive device

    I would like more proof the black spot exists though before considering this as a possible source of such a phenominon.

    Kind Regards Walker




    You are only a bullet away from being stupid.

  7. #7
    Sergeant Major Wilco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 18 2003
    Location
    Camp Lejeune
    Posts
    1,612
    Cool ***

    Too bad we can't populate certain spots of Jupiter if we ever do.



    2nd Light Armored Recon Battalion, 2nd Marine Division

  8. #8
    It's actually a fairly interesting article; normally I don't hold with boring stuff like astronomy, but I actually managed to make it all the way down to where he started giving formulas and using big words. After that he kind of lost me, but I can vouch for everything up to that point being extremely fascinating.

  9. #9
    here is an older article "warning" about the possibility of such event...


    also, here is the article from space.com about the jupiter spots. It seems the second spot image was one of the jupiter's moons, Ganymede, but the first spot is still without explanation.

  10. #10
    It's the crucial first strike against the Jovians

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •