Page 3 of 137 FirstFirst 12345671353103 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 1361

  Click here to go to the first Developer post in this thread.  

Thread: Modern usmc marpat

  1. #21
    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Suchey @ Jan. 14 2003,09:39)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I updated the picture...the picture in post number one of this thread will continue to update as I make changes. ***

    ...I did some work on the vest as backpack...I never did like the other one much...I also did some work on the vest pocketing and configuration. ***

    ...regarding weapons: As stated above, Im not really sure what Im going to do yet. ***Best case scenario I get a kick ass custom m16a4...however, since this is my first OFP addon, Im not really sure how to do the configs for weapons/scopes, etc. so no promises on the rifles.[/QUOTE]<span id='postcolor'>
    Good work. To be honest, I&#39;d be happy if you just used the stock BIS-made weapons that come with the game. Perhaps replace the M60 with a FNMag (M240) and add a M249 SAW to the pack (like the UK Project&#39;s UK Marine teaser addon).
    Other then that, it might be best to just stick with the stock M16A2 that comes with the game at least until yourself or someone else creates a good M16A4 for the pack...then you can always update it or just release the M16A4 as a seperate addon. But it would be cool to integrate the M240 and M249 in the pack. But maybe if we&#39;re lucky someone can whip up a good M16A4 soon... perhaps a modification of a pre-existing addon.

    Chris G.
    aka-Miles Teg<GD>
    -Expect the Unexpected-

    http://www.thelostbrothers.com/

  2. #22
    Excellent work&#33;

    Adding a M249 and a M240 and a modified M203 along the lines of SEBNampack 2.0 (grenade "bags", a more accurate maxrange etc) would fit my wishes perfectly. More weapons can be added later or released as separte files just as Miles Teg say imho too.
    Don&#39;t try and cram in to much into the pack. We want to see it "soon". *** ***




  3. #23
    Gunnery Sergeant
    Join Date
    Aug 3 2001
    Location
    Montreal.Canada
    Posts
    581
    you can also use (with authoriztion) flp m4 pack for your recon units

  4. #24
    Master Gunnery Sergeant
    Join Date
    Jan 4 2002
    Location
    New Jersey - USA
    Posts
    1,006
    Suchey, those Marines are coming out brilliantly&#33;

    Those MOLLE back packs look like they are dead on. Do you think you could post a picture of their chest so we could see the LBV?

    I agree with Miles though, the M16A2 is pretty common so seeing a Marine with a normal A2 wouldn&#39;t be too odd.

  5. #25
    First Sergeant
    Join Date
    Aug 20 2001
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    971
    Author of the Thread
    Thanks for the feedback guys...I am planning on making a complete replacement pack for the standard NATO side so there will be different classes with a slightly different look to them...for example, I just updated the pic again (see the first post in this thread for picture) ...the soldier pictured there is intended to be the grenadier/m203 soldier. The corpsman (medic) will look slightly different as will the remaing soldiers. Keep in mind that the green skimask face is simply the face I use in OFP and that the soldiers face WILL change according to what you have set up, so your not stuck with ski mask...of course, if you like it, you can download that and a few other different cammo type faces I made at www.digitalgrenade.com
    \"I&#39;d trade it all for just a little more\"

  6. #26
    Wow.. those look great. Any chance we can see US Army skins for those soldiers in the future?

    Maybe 82nd Airborne or 10th Mountain Div?

  7. #27
    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Suchey @ Jan. 14 2003,00:26)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Thanks...I originally tried using the full molle packs, but the models animations arent built to move around it...when they crouch or go prone the pack clips into different sections of the model...I will, however, see what I can do...maybe I can come up with a solution of some sort.[/QUOTE]<span id='postcolor'>
    Hey nice work &#33;

    They look incredible, can t wait to use them.

    About the backpacks.

    HK pack ( i think, but quite sure about it ) have units with big backpacks, they are found in resistance => diversomething or scoutdiver, something like that - could be wrong, i m at work, but i ll check tonight -.

    Maybe you can checkout this unit to see how they overcame the clipping problem. ***They are really big and long backpacks, in any case, bigger than the pick cloney showed.

    Cheers




  8. #28
    Master Gunnery Sergeant
    Join Date
    Jan 4 2002
    Location
    New Jersey - USA
    Posts
    1,006
    JAP-

    Those packs that Suchey put on his Marines are the actual MOLLE II Packs that the Marines are currently putting into service.

  9. #29
    if you guys like that go to the operation nothstar site, it has canadian soldiers in cadpat, which is the design that the USMC modified. please dont argue saying NO WE HAD IT FIRST...really, a company where I live invented it about 6 years ago and our entire army is outfitted with it (took to bloody long to enter service though).

    ever see a man disapear 20 feet infront of you
    Hummer is a sexual act....not a military vehicle&#33;

  10. #30
    oh and another thing I read, marine force recon uses Iron sights only...quicker to get a sight picture at close range...not that it matters.............BRRRAAAP

Page 3 of 137 FirstFirst 12345671353103 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •