Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 32

  Click here to go to the first Developer post in this thread.  

Thread: Congratulations to NASA and JPL, Curiosity touch down.

  1. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Hans Ludwig View Post
    Eight billion dollars wasted on sending a very expensive remote control car to find out what we already know or don't really care: Life doesn't exist anymore on Mars. I probably wouldn't care at all if these scientist went to Kickstarter to fund their own adventures instead of using my money, or I should say the Chinese' money that was lent to us by buying our bonds.
    With such narrowminded view, your country wouldn't even been discovered.

  2. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by ProfTournesol View Post
    With such narrowminded view, your country wouldn't even been discovered.
    The East India Company wasn't funded through taxes, but rather selling of stock. In other words, they were able to do what they did because of capital. If you need any lessons on US history, feel free to PM.

    By the way, I'm half Sioux. That side of my family would lay claim to discovering North American thousands of years before the Europeans on a fraction of the cost.

    There is always someone like you that loves spending other peoples' money on discovering something that is not that important. It really doesn't make any logical sense to borrow money from China to fund such a trip that then devalues personal savings and creates inflation, the increase in prices for goods and services. Wouldn't it have been better served taking care of those that most directly needed it because of the bad economy?

  3. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Hans Ludwig View Post
    Eight billion dollars wasted on sending a very expensive remote control car to find out what we already know or don't really care: Life doesn't exist anymore on Mars. I probably wouldn't care at all if these scientist went to Kickstarter to fund their own adventures instead of using my money, or I should say the Chinese' money that was lent to us by buying our bonds.
    We are humans duhh, We want to explore, discover new things... They dont only look for life on mars but if its suitable for us humans to live there when our planet will be no longer habitable because of our stupidity
    Or perhaps US has differ way... Oil young chap? Naaa

  4. #14
    I shall not insult moderators
    Join Date
    Nov 25 2010
    Posts
    1,576
    Author of the Thread
    Ummmm I thought it was $2.6 billion?
    That's $2.6 billion over the course of nearly 8 years. That's about $325 million a year. The amount of money spent on Curiosity's development, flight, and two year mission is the amount of money that the US Department of Defense spends every 36 hours.

    There are lots of journalists asking "is it worth it?". That's because they don't understand the science or the engineering or it's importance and find it boring. Space science has thousands of spin offs that benefit everyone, every day.
    http://www.nasa.gov/50th/50th_magazine/benefits.html
    Last edited by PELHAM; Aug 10 2012 at 01:09.

  5. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by PELHAM View Post
    Ummmm I thought it was $2.6 billion?
    It depends on how you're calculating inflation, and you are also forgetting to factor in budget/cost overruns, which the Office of Budget and Management never includes in their reports. Unfortunately we will have to wait for either next fiscal year or next quarter for the Congressional Budget Office to release their cost and benefit analysis.

    Quote Originally Posted by PELHAM View Post
    There are lots of journalists asking "is it worth it?". That's because they don't understand the science or the engineering or it's importance and find it boring. Space science has thousands of spin offs that benefit everyone, every day.
    Of course you like this adventure NASA took because you didn't pay for it. It's what economist call the Moral Hazard. It's also a subjective, value based judgement you placed on this NASA mission.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sakowski View Post
    We are humans duhh, We want to explore, discover new things...
    Who is arguing against that? If you want to send something to Mars to look for life, then do it through capital investment or actually pay for it yourself, which I hardly doubt you did the later of.
    Last edited by Hans Ludwig; Aug 10 2012 at 01:34.

  6. #16
    Sergeant Major STALKERGB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 9 2008
    Location
    Good old Blighty!
    Posts
    1,478
    @Hans, well yeah technically you can say a lot of things humans do are completely pointless, but then thinking like that never gets us anywhere. Although MSL's Curiosity will be an incredibly useful scientific resource the fact that as a race, we have proven we are capable of doing such a thing successfully is an achievement in of itself.

    Just because a scientific project wasn't privately funded and you don't think it was worth the time and money doesn't mean it wasn't worth it. A lot of scientific discoveries have come off the back of funding from a government.

    With such narrowminded view, your country wouldn't even been discovered.
    The East India Company wasn't funded through taxes, but rather selling of stock. In other words, they were able to do what they did because of capital. If you need any lessons on US history, feel free to PM.
    I assume we are talking about the discovery of the Americas? In which case Columbus was employed by the Spanish Monarchy, in fact before getting Spanish support didn't he go to the Portuguese Monarchy to try to get their backing? The East India Company had nothing to do with it though.

    Ummmm I thought it was $2.6 billion?
    The Telegraph put the price of the rover itself at only $1.6Bn, and MSL's total project costs at around $2.5Bn (which includes the rover)

    EDIT: The colour photos from the surface look really good!

    http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/6...-full_full.jpg
    http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/6...-full_full.jpg
    Last edited by STALKERGB; Aug 10 2012 at 03:01.
    STALKERGB ♪♫ AFK in RL...

    British 3 Rifle MTP Release thread - Twitter with updates on WIP: @Mat_Kav

  7. #17
    science was/is/will be the future of manking. I'm proud to be an human, when I see a such a feat. money is never wasted for science, but it is wasted to pay footballers and other athletes.
    Sennacherib aka d@nte

    Un ali mat zo mat bepred Ha pa ve digant ur sot e ve

    (Good advice is always good, even though it comes from an idiot).

  8. #18
    I shall not insult moderators
    Join Date
    Nov 25 2010
    Posts
    1,576
    Author of the Thread
    Quote Originally Posted by Hans Ludwig View Post
    It depends on how you're calculating inflation, and you are also forgetting to factor in budget/cost overruns, which the Office of Budget and Management never includes in their reports. Unfortunately we will have to wait for either next fiscal year or next quarter for the Congressional Budget Office to release their cost and benefit analysis.
    It's $2.6 Billion over 8 years - 6 of those years have already passed with $1.8 Billion of the budget expended on development and launch, if it continues work after it's remaining 2 years that will cost extra but nowhere near $8 Billion. To give you some idea, the 10 years of mission extensions to both previous Mars Rovers have cost $124 million. Sorry - the $8 Billion you made up, is just nonsense.

    Lol at the East India Company discovering the Americas, it was founded over a century after to trade exclusively on a different continent........the clue is in the name.
    Last edited by PELHAM; Aug 10 2012 at 12:44.

  9. #19
    Chief Warrant Officer mrcash2009's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 13 2007
    Location
    39.906839,25.259972
    Posts
    3,938
    The Telegraph put the price of the rover itself at only $1.6Bn, and MSL's total project costs at around $2.5Bn (which includes the rover)
    The fact that we debate "only" within the billion range is funny based on what a 1-2 billion injection could do elsewhere for sure on the planet we reside on right now & try to live.

    Although I am impressed on what they have achieved from a technical standpoint to slingshot that size machinery that far and get it to land on a pretty much untested entry (well untested until its actually happening). Interesting to check out more of the hi res images.

    But the other side of me is on the lines of Hans view in terms of sticking a highly expensive bit of kit on a barren planet we dont live on taking pictures of it looking as such and science getting its jolly's off on the data. Interesting, I have a conflicting view on it from both ends, cant disagree on the technical and science aspect, but then not so impressed on the grand scheme of human life, the here and now and the way things are in the here and right now, no matter the data and snapshots.

    I guess anything further derails the point of the thread (heading into USA politics territory) for the achievement and the subject, but, well .... 2 billion ..... barren planet and science benefits .... life on earth now and current economic situation ..... hmmmmm, not sure.

    Although congrats to the team for the achievement ... I think this is what's known as a happy sand switch post.
    Last edited by mrcash2009; Aug 12 2012 at 13:12.

    Extensive Addon/Mods List | Addon/Mods Help Thread | Patching Arma Guide |
    Voice Activation Thread (with profiles) | AI Command Guide | My Vimeo Page

    LiquidPinky: "Screw Steam, I wouldn't feed it my shite if it was starving" 2012.

  10. #20
    I shall not insult moderators
    Join Date
    Nov 25 2010
    Posts
    1,576
    Author of the Thread
    Quote Originally Posted by mrcash2009 View Post
    The fact that we debate "only" within the billion range is funny based on what a 1-2 billion injection could do elsewhere for sure on the planet we reside on right now & try to live.
    Think of it as extreme engineering and research and development. What are the possible spinoffs? It's doubtfull many of the benefits all of us experience today would exist without projects like this. The money doesn't simply disappear into space, it funds thousands of science, engineering and manufacturing jobs, that is important to the economy:

    NASA Launches New Technology Transfer Portal
    "A priority of NASA is to get federally-funded new technologies into the commercial marketplace," said NASA Chief Technologist Mason Peck. "We're hopeful that entrepreneurs, businesses of all sizes and anyone looking for innovative solutions to technology problems will explore NASA's Technology Transfer Portal to find opportunities to transfer NASA technologies into innovative solutions for the nation."
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_spin-off_technologies
    http://spinoff.nasa.gov/
    http://www.techbriefs.com/

    You could of course simply dump the money for short term gain, then the people that benefited would return next year and ask for more, as they always do......
    Last edited by PELHAM; Aug 12 2012 at 15:30.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Touch-Buddy touch screen GUI for ArmA
    By AXR in forum ARMA - GENERAL
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: Jun 5 2007, 13:27
  2. NASA's Deep Impact going to Temple 1
    By Red Oct in forum OFFTOPIC
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: Jul 9 2005, 05:37
  3. Nasa hasn't changed one bit
    By toadlife in forum OFFTOPIC
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: Nov 12 2003, 23:16
  4. Replies: 36
    Last Post: Nov 11 2003, 10:44
  5. Just out of curiosity
    By Tigershark_BAS in forum ADDONS & MODS: DISCUSSION
    Replies: 112
    Last Post: Sep 13 2003, 13:44

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •