2s25 "Sprut-SD" Tank Destroyer

[STGN]

Well armor and penetration values are always difficult. From reading around then Sprut-SD has equal protection to a BMP(23mm AP protection)
M1A2 should have larger damage than Sprut-SD. Because the newer M829A2/3 rounds have longer and heavier penetrating rods compared to Russian 125 rounds. The autoloader in Russians legacy tanks limits how long and thus how heavy they can be. This means that despite the larger gun caliber of Russian guns there is less energy going down range. According to all the info I have seen the 3BM42 projectile which you use is roughly 2/3 the damage of M829A2 and roughly half of the A3.
The M1A2 SEP values seems to be in line with Common Armor value system. Using those values your round should do 490 in damage.

Oh I thought that thing in front of the hatch was a rotating periscope, thats what it seems like when you use the tank in game.
STGN

[=SappeR=]

All what you have written is quite funny and full of prejudice. And You don't understand the formalities ?
I trying do it fair to the original game and some addons.
So I think "M1A2 SEP" exaggerated...

Common Armor value system

And how much Addons has been done on this table?

your round should do 490 in damage."

No, thanks... I think that in fact this gun is strong enough to deal effectively with the tanks. ("Sprut-SD" received an upgraded gun, different from those used in the tanks.)
That's what I want to realize in this addon.

Armor I made a fairly low ...

[STGN]

It is? Formalities? What ever, didn't come here to argue, you do what you want. Would just like to say that it was not my intention to impose values on your addon was just trying to explain where the values used in the M1A2 addon came from, you don't have to use them, 490 is just the number they listed for the 3BM42. Instead of editing my words try to read things in context: "Using those values your round should do 490 in damage".

Now some basic fysics and food for thought:
(2003)M829A3 penetrator weights about 7kg and goes 1555m/s thats (7kg/2)x(1555m/s^2) = 8.5 MegaJoule

(1986)3BM42 penetrator weights 4.85KG and goes 1700m/s thats (4.85kg/2)x(1700m/s^2) = 7 MJ
STGN

[=SappeR=]

Do you believe everything, what they write on the Internet? Oh .. I do not care.

[STGN]

All right, where was I wrong and why. I don't understand your use of the word "formalities" what was the meaning? Why is it wrong to think that a more recent weapon is more effective than an older one? Do you care to enlighten me?
STGN

[=SappeR=]

Formalities. I mean conditional. (difficulties of translation)
All names of weapons it's all conditional. I make the concept of combat unit - tank destroyer.
That just a game - this can not do "Like in life"... Moreover, from where we know how it really is.

Why is it wrong to think that a more recent weapon is more effective than an older one?

Maybe because it is not proven? (New does not necessarily mean better.)
P.S. To believe anything - need to see with own eyes ... >_<

[=SappeR=]

Version 1.1
Downloads:
01-Download (mediafire.com)
02-Download (narod.ru)
========
- Fixed scripts (reducing the load on the processor)
- Improved visual Lods.
========
First post update.

[Revan9190]

Sweet, I'll definitely give this version a try.

[-RuN-]

Nice, thanks for keeping at it.