I'm sure I don't know what the standard practice is for BIS and switching off AI can mean switching part of it off, look up disableAI, BIS might well have more params than the ones we see."Switching AI off" seems plausible to you (even though it makes zero sense) but not turning on the invulnerability (which is actually the standard practice)?
Since you ask I should say your demo being awkwardly cut short in the middle...What breaks a presentation to journos more - AI acting smart or your demo being awkwardly cut short in the middle?
Really? So all the beta patches where things are fixed, changed & added do not represent reconsideration? I know you like to be pessimistic and all but I think you're overdoing the act trying to gauge actual AI behaviors from videos where you don't know the parameters is a losing game. This is why we'll be getting an alpha, so that we can know the parameters.Hey I know you want to be optimistic and all but I'm pretty sure you know that when BIS decides to change something there's nothing in the world that will ever make them reconsider when it's finalized.
To what end? Paranoia without backup is just noise. Pointing to a video and calling that evidence is not really helpful. I suggest waiting until the alpha is released, and real evidence can be achieved.Better have a dosage of paranoia (which is supported by many presentations) now than when it's already too late.