Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 7891011
Results 101 to 107 of 107

Thread: Optimization and worse graphics: The key to a fivefold increase in sales of ARMA 3

  1. #101
    Also, an important note on the talk about graphic-options (In case it havent been mentioned yet). Being able to lower the games graphics too much quickly becomes a problem in PVP. Users playing on very low settings are able to spot other players a lot easier than they who have higher graphics enabled, obviously because of more clutter and vegetation covering their sight. This is something that all multiplayer-based games struggle to balance, especially big and open games like ArmA. This often leads to competitive players lowering their graphics just to be able to see eachother better, and care less about the actual immersion. And that's a game-breaker if you ask me.

    I'd say this is also a problem in coop, as your comrades can spot enemies that you might not be able to see at all from that same position. I've experienced this as rather frustrating in the past, seeing parts of your group shooting like mad men through the bushes, while the rest have no idea of what the hell they're shooting at.

    So I believe that lowering graphics has to have a certain limit for the game to be relatively fair, eventhough it's of course technically possible to have even lower settings available.

  2. #102
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Bravo View Post
    Also, an important note on the talk about graphic-options (In case it havent been mentioned yet). Being able to lower the games graphics too much quickly becomes a problem in PVP. Users playing on very low settings are able to spot other players a lot easier than they who have higher graphics enabled, obviously because of more clutter and vegetation covering their sight. This is something that all multiplayer-based games struggle to balance, especially big and open games like ArmA. This often leads to competitive players lowering their graphics just to be able to see eachother better, and care less about the actual immersion. And that's a game-breaker if you ask me.

    I'd say this is also a problem in coop, as your comrades can spot enemies that you might not be able to see at all from that same position. I've experienced this as rather frustrating in the past, seeing parts of your group shooting like mad men through the bushes, while the rest have no idea of what the hell they're shooting at.

    So I believe that lowering graphics has to have a certain limit for the game to be relatively fair, eventhough it's of course technically possible to have even lower settings available.
    I should think it's possible for the server to force some requirements, pretty much already does in any case I doubt someone with a low end rig would be playing competitive games, more like SP timekilling or development.
    Fire And Smoke for ArmA2: JTD_FireAndSmoke v0.2

    For better future effects addons, please vote for this ticket.

  3. #103
    I don't agree.

    A studio focusing on laptop quality computers being able to play next gen FPS games is great but at no point will it ever be a focus. Games like ARMA 3 and other next gen titles should always be pushing as hard and far as they can go with graphics and physics to develop and advance video games. It's great it a studio supports the ability to play a game on weak hardware through optimisation but never should it be a focus and never should such customers be bale to play the game and remove visual elements from the game that will make it easier for them competativly against someone with max settings enabled. It should be the other way round. Instead the game should be optimisied well enough that poor computers within reason can still play the game just well enough.

    Honestly think BF3 and it's hardware requirements as badly optimised as the game is, is the way games should be. Pushing the envelope graphically. Because without all the HDR effects, totally messed up gamma and hue settings and horrible character models the game does look beautiful.

  4. #104
    just make players transparent for low gfx settings. They shouldnt be able to see them. make it so.

  5. #105
    Sergeant Major Mosh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 17 2002
    Location
    St. Louis, Missouri - USA
    Posts
    1,605
    I don't agree.

    I don't want lesser quality graphics because YOU can't afford a proper gaming computer... not my problem. I don't mean to be harsh but that's how I feel.

    Windows 7 64-bit | AMD FX 8350 4.0 GHZ |
    GTX 570 (310.70) | 32 GB RAM
    OCZ Agility 3 120 GB SSD | OCZ Agility 2 120 GB SSD | OCZ Vertex Plus 60 GB SSD | Intel 80 GB SSD
    Logitech G500 G15 G930 | TrackIR 5 | Saitek X52 Pro + Pro Flight Rudder

  6. #106
    For those who want argue in favour of reduced quality graphics go watch the new gameplay footage posted on http://www.ceskatelevize.cz/porady/1...me-page/video/ today then start saving for a awesome gaming rig, because your going to want one!

  7. #107
    Quote Originally Posted by kimozabbi View Post
    For those who want argue in favour of reduced quality graphics go watch the new gameplay footage posted on http://www.ceskatelevize.cz/porady/1...me-page/video/ today then start saving for a awesome gaming rig, because your going to want one!
    Pretty cool gameplay. And we got to see some new animations. Yeah, there's no way BIS is going to lower the graphics quality. OP should hope that the lowest settings are made to allow ArmA3 to run on low-end machines.

    NATO Special Operations Command Addon | SCO Joint Forces Command Addon

    System Specs:
    Spoiler:

Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 7891011

Similar Threads

  1. Flickering graphics, worse when looking sky
    By Tankbuster in forum ARMA 2 & OA - TROUBLESHOOTING
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: Jun 13 2011, 06:49
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: May 22 2011, 05:03
  3. Worse graphics errors with ATI HD4890
    By Sn@keByte in forum ARMA 2 & OA - TROUBLESHOOTING
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Jun 23 2009, 20:46
  4. Graphics are better, but looks worse!
    By gneed in forum GENERAL
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Jul 18 2002, 09:20

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •