So... from all this repetition, I could put a comprehensible list of how the discussions will go, but I don't feel like going through all the dumbassery from both sides, so I'll just include the final steps:
Hater gets replaced by another one in a couple of weeks
LEGO T-100 looks better than arma 3 T-100! What a shame!
Maybe i should buy few boxes of LEGO instead of upgrading my PC and buying arma 3??
P.S. Hate flickr hosting. that shit do not allow me to insert photos directly to forum!
Last edited by Ihatecheaters; Jul 3 2012 at 16:18.
You need to find a new hobby. Bashing the artwork is (and always was) super boring.
What is relevant is that in the armaverse, they decided to dig up the black eagle design and turn it into a proper production run tank. Because it was such a mysterious prototype, not much is known about it, and because people know it and because it looks badass, it´s a reasonable choice for the game. As long as the ingame explanation doesn´t involve handwaves, magic or aliens, I don´t care.
What I worry about is the core mechanics, gameplay, UI, AI, useabillity and access to mod tools questions. You´re bashing the artwork. That´s like bashing the paintjob of a car: it doesn´t adress any important issues at all, and as such, nobody benefits from it.
Encumbrance + Fatigue System basic suggestions: http://feedback.arma3.com/view.php?id=11030
Suggestion for improvement in absence of 3D vehicle interiors: http://feedback.arma3.com/view.php?id=12555
Request to improve control of vehicle AI: control turning out, weapons and engine on/off: http://feedback.arma3.com/view.php?id=13397
DR style handling of Missile Launcher reloading: http://feedback.arma3.com/view.php?id=11075