We have a bit of a previous thread bugbear do we Mr Gatekeeper?mrcash posts some crap he found on the internet and didn't check it, again. Busted your conspiracy theory in 3 mins simply by following the reference link in the website
"Bigger picture" Pelham, you simply reactive counter small elements (yawn #2), so thanks and all that, same old same old. BTW how is it a conspiracy theory to highlight what is factual, its not as if this does not happen. Its just how its packaged (ref the doc / how the article views it),
"My" conspiracy theory eh ... interesting phrasing, seems the article was not the focus here (yawn #3).
From the sub set of subjects & keywords me think that this is not actualy fully the case, only a part of its use, but hey .. thats life Mr Gatekeeper. Others will highlight it, and some others will get thier reactive panties in a bunch.It is quite clearly a procedure for media analysis in the event of an emergency or natural disaster.