Page 1 of 7 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 61

  Click here to go to the first Developer post in this thread.  

Thread: DSutils v2 release (signatures)

  1.   Click here to go to the next Developer post in this thread.   #1

    Exclamation DSutils v2 release (signatures)

    For server admins and addon makers

    http://community.bistudio.com/wiki/DSUtils_2


    more details : http://forums.bistudio.com/showthread.php?t=115114

    Note:
    - The server with verifySignatures=1 will check both v1 and v2 signatures.
    - With verifySignatures=2 the server will reject clients using any addons which are signed by v1 signatures only.
    - The new signatures are understood by old clients and servers as well, but they do not provide any enhanced security for them

    http://community.bistudio.com/wiki/A...Side_Scripting

    level checkFile and regularCheck are what admins must use for optimal security

    remember if you use the signature tool it overwrite the same filename used for v1 with v2
    Last edited by Suma; May 16 2011 at 11:04. Reason: Clarified compatibility, clarified verifySignatures

  2. #2

    Addon Signer GUI

    Hey,
    I developed a GUI for signing add-ons:
    http://soner.forgesoft.net/ArmA2AS.zip



    Have Fun!
    Last edited by Soner; Apr 29 2011 at 14:35.
    ArmA 2 RCon GUI 1.8 *NEW*:
    http://dev-heaven.net/projects/rcon

    ArmA 2 AddonSigner *NEW*:
    https://dev-heaven.net/projects/addon-signer

  3. #3
    Thank you masters of the ArmAverse!

    And thanks Soner, that seems like an easy to use and useful tool!
    A.C.E. Advanced Combat Environment

    Dev-Heaven.net Free Project Hosting | A2 Community Issue Tracker Help BIS, Help yourself!

  4.   Click here to go to the next Developer post in this thread.   #4
    BI Developer Dwarden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 5 2002
    Location
    Czech Republic
    Posts
    7,900
    Author of the Thread
    added some more details for admins

  5. #5
    How is this going to work in combination with BinPBO´s "Create signature" function?

    REALISM! No, fuck that, FIRE THE LASER!

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Sickboy View Post
    Thank you masters of the ArmAverse!

    And thanks Soner, that seems like an easy to use and useful tool!
    get that on DH.

  7. #7
    Interesting part is that you don't have to create a new key, the createKey utility has remained untouched.

  8.   Click here to go to the next Developer post in this thread.   #8
    BI Developer Dwarden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 5 2002
    Location
    Czech Republic
    Posts
    7,900
    Author of the Thread
    actually the file will be overwritten using v2 signature, so i updated the post with the compatibility way we used ...

    these who sign can decide if they use theirs old signature to replace v1 with v2 ignoring backward compatibility
    or they follow the compatibility example

  9. #9
    CWR² Developer Mikero's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 9 2006
    Location
    Norfolk Island, South Pacific
    Posts
    126
    well, this is not making a great deal of sense signature files wise. so far as i can see all bi have done is release a new public key against a new internal private key. That's fine and good, and hardly earth shattering.

    pbo's themselves and the signatures *they* already have, don't change, nor could they.

    the so called version2 stuff might well only work with bi2 bikeys, that's engine functionality, but nothing appears to be any different dsSignature tools wise and i'm suprised (and confused) what purpose re-releasing these 3 exes do for arrowhead that the old tools don't do in any case.

  10. #10

Page 1 of 7 12345 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •