Page 28 of 32 FirstFirst ... 18242526272829303132 LastLast
Results 271 to 280 of 320

Thread: equal damage or effect from damage on east and west tanks

  1. #271
    Quote Originally Posted by Ollie1983 View Post
    You have to excuse me for laughing, but do you really think a website with the prefix .ru might be a wholly impartial source of information about the performance of Russian military equipment?

    And Wiki, the Dagestan war thing, not a lot mentioned there about the T-90 mate.
    Yes this is true. In fact russians are all liars and have for years been deceiving the west! Detailed picture analysis has proven that Russian tanks are in fact made of stacked cardboard and powered only by cheap Italian FIAT car engines. Yesterday when I was wanking to a picture of a M1 Abrams tank it all came to me. Russia doesn't actually exist! Its all a lie created by the filthy Euros to have expensive superior American military forces deployed there to protect them from ehh err Germany! yes Germany!

    All this years you've been tricked! There never was an ironcurtain nor a humongous industrial, military, and political coalition in the east. Its all tent camps and horses. I'd say this qualifies as proof of a massive cover up and I'd NEVER been able to figure it out! Its all thanks to you Ollie1983.

    -k
    ARMA 2 Mission packs:LITE Coop mission package + LIMA coop mission package (ACE + ACRE) + More ACE + ACRE missions. + Aliabad coop Mission Package+ Fireforce Takistan NEW
    ARMA 3 Mission packs:Fourplay Coop Mission Pack NEW
    Kill things, break stuff. Repeat as necessary.

  2. #272
    Quote Originally Posted by NkEnNy View Post
    Yesterday when I was wanking to a picture of a M1 Abrams tank it all came to me.
    Hahaha. I bet.


    Please use the CWR2 CBT to help us provide a better experience.
    Show solidarity in the face of those who want to violate your rights! Join the Addon Makers for Authors' Rights Forum Group Today!

    Note to all Squads and Clans. We have updated the S&FP forum guidelines. If you have a thread there, please read the new guidelines


  3. #273
    Chief Warrant Officer Beagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 30 2001
    Location
    Holy Roman Empire
    Posts
    3,385
    Quote Originally Posted by NkEnNy View Post
    Yesterday when I was wanking to a picture of a M1 Abrams tank it all came to me.
    Thats nothing, I'ven seen guys wanking, pissing and vomiting INSIDE of a Leopard II.

  4. #274
    You do have some peculiar views mate.

    There is a simple reason why Western designers had to to be very specific and careful with their claims about their products, not least because their competitors (IE other western companies) were trying to sell similar equipment and any illegitimate claim would be torn to pieces very quickly, which looks bad to your customers when you are trying to sell them multibillion dollar defence projects....

    I'm going to have to admit I had a great laugh at your .RU website and your claims it was as equally valid in subject matter and evidence when compared to Janes- an international organisaton of certified experts who use verified data and sources. Unlike some Soviet fanboi website written by a collection of guys all dreaming of the resurgence of the soviet union...

  5. #275
    Major DM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 6 2002
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    7,637
    Quote Originally Posted by Ollie1983 View Post
    There is a simple reason why Western designers had to to be very specific and careful with their claims about their products, not least because their competitors (IE other western companies) were trying to sell similar equipment and any illegitimate claim would be torn to pieces very quickly
    Oh how naïve you are...


    The "west" is full of just as much bullshit as the "east" when it comes to mil-specs...
    Quote Originally Posted by ***LeGeNDK1LLER*** View Post
    well you are 1 of the greatest examples that pressing the reply button doesn't mean necessarily answering.

  6. #276
    Quote Originally Posted by Ollie1983 View Post
    There is a simple reason why Western designers had to to be very specific and careful with their claims about their products, not least because their competitors (IE other western companies) were trying to sell similar equipment and any illegitimate claim would be torn to pieces very quickly, which looks bad to your customers when you are trying to sell them multibillion dollar defence projects....
    Damn straight.

    If its one thing western capitalism does get right its that the BEST product wins all the time. I mean it always does what it says on the box, particularly when it comes to modern military equipment. How else could they sell it?

    In the Soviet Union equipment specifications, production facilities and executive design decisions all came down to politicians, their hordes of lying cronies and the Generals/Admirals currently in favour. No wonder all they did was crap!

    Man you've really made me see things clearer Ollie.

    -k

  7. #277
    Quote Originally Posted by NkEnNy View Post
    Damn straight.

    If its one thing western capitalism does get right its that the BEST product wins all the time. I mean it always does what it says on the box, particularly when it comes to modern military equipment. How else could they sell it?

    In the Soviet Union equipment specifications, production facilities and executive design decisions all came down to politicians, their hordes of lying cronies and the Generals/Admirals currently in favour. No wonder all they did was crap!

    Man you've really made me see things clearer Ollie.

    -k
    Are you being sarcastic, or do you just not know anything about the corruption and waste of U.S. military acquisitions.

    Capitalism my ass.

  8. #278
    Chief Warrant Officer Beagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 30 2001
    Location
    Holy Roman Empire
    Posts
    3,385
    Quote Originally Posted by DM View Post
    Oh how naïve you are...


    The "west" is full of just as much bullshit as the "east" when it comes to mil-specs...
    Definately...I have worked for such a company, in one incident they knew that a APC prototype had a bad cooling problem for the electronics...so they kept it cool and showed in in acton only for 30 minutes to army officers on a inspection...because the electronics blackout never happened before 40 minutes. I did work in production line and believe me...ive seen in lot of shoddy work done by badly trained and badly payed workers happening in the defense industries.
    he western industries are about to mimic china in lots of aspects to sage costs and maximize profit, defense industry is not excluded in this strategy.

    The numbers given in the glossy brochures are always taken under optimum conditions...every servicemen knows that the capabilities under field conditiosn are rarly aanywhere near the "official" statements, no matter if its a rifle or a Guided missile System or a thermal observation system.

    Life it not so simplyfied as games tend to be...a bit to much oil or grease on your Optics may spoil the whole performance and sometimes a damned broken knob takes you technically out of action.

    Have a closer look!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icJOjKwn_7Y

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CTad...eature=related

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axk76...eature=related
    Last edited by Beagle; Apr 27 2011 at 23:17.

  9. #279
    Quote Originally Posted by Ollie1983 View Post
    ... Janes- an international organisaton of certified experts who use verified data and sources.
    Janes Information Group is a publisher from UK that prints out defense reports based on the publicly available information. Their data is far from universally verified and no one certifies their "experts". They are prone to biases and misinformation just like everyone else. Their data is far from verified and they are only as good as their sources (which might include that same Russian website that you are so fired up against).

    Peace,
    DreDay

  10. #280
    Quote Originally Posted by DreDay View Post
    Janes Information Group is a publisher from UK that prints out defense reports based on the publicly available information. Their data is far from universally verified and no one certifies their "experts". They are prone to biases and misinformation just like everyone else. Their data is far from verified and they are only as good as their sources (which might include that same Russian website that you are so fired up against).

    Peace,
    DreDay
    Errr, all their data and intelligence is open source. The very fact they have been at their game and are respected internationally and in many industry circles, I think, makes them 'experts' in my understanding of the term. Perhaps you have data to suggest the contrary, though. please do share it.

    Again, apparently western manufacturers are all corrupt and produce utterly crap designs and are forced to fabricate performance reports. That being the case, one does wonder why foreign powers spend so much money with them...

    Corruption and deceit was basically a way of live in the Soviet union. Such was their fear of the West. It would appear that even non-FSU residents are prepared to accept their claims. Thank heavens Beagle is not responsible for defence procurement.

Page 28 of 32 FirstFirst ... 18242526272829303132 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •