PDA

View Full Version : Sexiest NON attack aircraft



Red Oct
Feb 6 2002, 19:33
i think they are all sexy

WisdoM
Feb 6 2002, 19:34
I dont know about the rest of you, but I prefer women http://www.flashpoint1985.com/ikonboard3/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif

Silencer
Feb 6 2002, 19:45
I like to watch porn than airplanes...

Assault (CAN)
Feb 6 2002, 19:46
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I dont know about the rest of you, but I prefer women[/QUOTE]<span id='postcolor'>

Me too, but I voted for the Huey&#33;

Tyler

Thehamster
Feb 6 2002, 19:59
Me thinks this topic is really pointless.

Red Oct
Feb 6 2002, 20:24
than dont read it

Thehamster
Feb 6 2002, 20:28
I had to read it to form the opinion that it was a pointless topic.

DVII
Feb 6 2002, 20:45
Wow a useless topic, gotta react quickly&#33; http://www.flashpoint1985.com/ikonboard3/non-cgi/emoticons/tounge.gif

I voted for C-130, Belgian airforce uses them and i see them every day.

Rogue2020
Feb 7 2002, 01:47
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Murda Inc @<hidden> Feb. 06 2002,09:34)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I dont know about the rest of you, but I prefer women http://www.flashpoint1985.com/ikonboard3/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif[/QUOTE]<span id='postcolor'>
Here here....

christophercles
Feb 7 2002, 08:12
i voted for the blackhawk. Awwwww yeah......

Gorgi Knootewoot
Feb 7 2002, 09:41
I votes for the ofsprey, but i think you meant Osprey

daniel barnett
Feb 8 2002, 19:03
no the ofsprey is a classified veichle designed soley 2 combat soldiers with lisps

Albert Schweitzer
Feb 8 2002, 20:07
Vehicules and airplanes can be sexy indeed. If you dont get this than it is no wonder that only the Italians and the Germans build beautiful cars. Engineers need to love what they are doing, and this you will see once their product is finished. If this love is missing and the engineer just does his job then you get a car like the Korean Daewoo or a plane like the RF-5E TigerEye ( I still like very much the old A-6 Intruder)


what a fucking ugly plane
http://www-atdp.berkeley.edu/Studentpages/khu/RF-5E.jpg

Supah
Feb 8 2002, 21:21
Sorry albert u may very well be a famous tropical explorer but ur opinion sucks IMHO. The german build the Tornado together with the italians and the British. It turned out to be the stupid ppl choicein fighter aviation. Unamnoucvarable, UGLY AS SIN, and weak. If 10 tornado&#39;s take of from leeuwarden Airbase (which i live near) 4 come back before they even reach the targeting range because of mechanical defects. There are targeting ranges on the frisian islands. The onlyu aircraft which routinly land at leeuwarden cuz they have failures are tornado&#39;s. The last 8&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33; aircraft to have crashed there were tornado&#39;s. Its crap, it was designed by germans and italians and brits (who have a saving grace for making the EE Lightning, can u spell cooooooooooool) so that opinion dont fly (like the tornado). Id have the F-5 any day, at least it resembles a aircraft not a brick like the tornado. (pls note that i have nothing against the germans/italians/british in general i like them allot just ppl qouting that ther nation designs prety planes when the have a monstrosity like the tornado on their consience)

ACT SMILEY
Feb 9 2002, 08:37
Ahhh yes. The Tornado. For once, we can&#39;t blame the French. Lets blame the Italians http://www.flashpoint1985.com/ikonboard3/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif
Its not ALL bad, just mostly. Especially when used at low altitudes like in the Gulf. The ground attack version is pointless when we have Jaguars.
As for the tornado&#39;s looks, its not too bad, but its performance is a bit shite.

The Lightning was pretty good.

Feb 9 2002, 13:29
F-14 D(?) TomCat all the way&#33;

Damage Inc
Feb 9 2002, 13:32
It said non attack aircraft.

Albert Schweitzer
Feb 9 2002, 14:05
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (supah @<hidden> Feb. 08 2002,23:21)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Sorry albert u may very well be a famous tropical explorer but ur opinion sucks IMHO. The german build the Tornado together with the italians and the British. It turned out to be the stupid ppl choicein fighter aviation. Unamnoucvarable, UGLY AS SIN, and weak. If 10 tornado&#39;s take of from leeuwarden Airbase (which i live near) 4 come back before they even reach the targeting range because of mechanical defects. There are targeting ranges on the frisian islands. The onlyu aircraft which routinly land at leeuwarden cuz they have failures are tornado&#39;s. The last 8&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33; aircraft to have crashed there were tornado&#39;s. Its crap, it was designed by germans and italians and brits (who have a saving grace for making the EE Lightning, can u spell cooooooooooool) so that opinion dont fly (like the tornado).  Id have the F-5 any day, at least it resembles a aircraft not a brick like the tornado. (pls note that i have nothing against the germans/italians/british in general i like them allot just ppl qouting that ther nation designs prety planes when the have a monstrosity like the tornado on their consience)[/QUOTE]<span id='postcolor'>
Yeah, I agree, I was more talking about cars though. But since this thread is about planes I need to reply to that (obligatory). The Tornado is not, a hyper-ugly plane. It may not be beautiful, there I agree. But what do you expect when you got an international cooperation&#33; What you can expect is a crossover of different styles. As for the Tornado that would mean Schnitzel with Mozarella and Mint Sauce. What can you expect from that?

My comment was rather about: can planes be sexy. And my statement was: Yes, even (or maybe especially) if they dont wear bombs and guns &#33; Wheter you like German-engineering or not doesnt change much about it&#33;

(and eh, the Eurofighter is gonna be goddamm ugly too, be prepared) http://www.flashpoint1985.com/ikonboard3/non-cgi/emoticons/tounge.gif

Supah
Feb 9 2002, 15:56
Again i disagree .... i find the eurofighter quite goodlooking. Now the JSF that the netherlands may buy .... there is ugly for you http://www.flashpoint1985.com/ikonboard3/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif I do however think that the JSF will be the better aircraft though.

Feb 9 2002, 16:34
Eurofighter sucks, Joint Strike Fighter rules http://www.flashpoint1985.com/ikonboard3/non-cgi/emoticons/tounge.gif.

daniel barnett
Feb 9 2002, 17:57
stealth fighter is sexy&#33;

Thehamster
Feb 9 2002, 21:42
I always liked the B52 bomber.

nordin dk
Feb 10 2002, 00:26
Boeing 747, reminds me of my ex...

Assault (CAN)
Feb 10 2002, 01:37
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">It said non attack aircraft.[/QUOTE]<span id='postcolor'>

The F-14D Tomcat is not an attack aircraft, it&#39;s a fighter aircraft, hence the "F" designation.

The Grippen is a COOL plane:


http://www.gunnery.net/graphics/aircraft/imagegallery.jpg

Don&#39;t diss the JSF&#33;, lol:

http://www.gunnery.net/graphics/aircraft/x35ajsf.jpg

The KA-50 is a mean mofo too:

http://www.gunnery.net/graphics/aircraft/ka505.jpg

Tyler